Did the Eleventh Circuit opinion improperly create a new bright-line rule, unsupported by authority and in derogation of principles of equity and of the discretion afforded to district courts, that equitable tolling of the one-year statute of limitation of AEDPA for filing a § 2254 habeas petition automatically lapses the moment a petitioner procures assistance of counsel?

Whether the Eleventh Circuit improperly created a new bright-line rule that equitable tolling of AEDPA's one-year statute of limitations automatically lapses when a petitioner procures counsel