No. 19-5009
Keon Anthony Nixon v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: balancing-test barker-v-wingo constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process post-indictment-delay prejudice right-to-counsel sixth-amendment speedy-trial speedy-trial-right
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a defendant's "failure to invoke the right to a speedy trial would be weighed heavily against him," despite "his lack of representation," and whether denial of counsel during the period of delay results in prejudice to a defendant.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant's 'failure to invoke the right to a speedy trial would be weighed heavily against him,' despite 'his lack of representation,' and whether denial of counsel during the period of delay results in prejudice to a defendant
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2019)
Attorneys
Keon Anthony Nixon
R. Scott Reisch — The Reisch Law Firm, LLC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent