No. 19-5002
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 4th-amendment cell-phone-evidence conflict-of-interest constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel life-sentence search-and-seizure warrantless-search
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION 1:
Whether the cell phone evidence was the product of
a warrantless search and seizure and/or an illegal
detention; and thus/ whether this evidence can be used
to convict Petitioner to life in prison?
QUESTION 2:
Whether a Defendants 14th Amendment rights are violated
and whether its a conflict of interest when a Defendant
files Ineffective Assistance of Trial Counsel claim
and the Defendant's trial attorney is now District
Attorney over Defendant's habeas corpus writ?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the cell phone evidence was the product of a warrantless search and seizure and/or an illegal detention; and thus, whether this evidence can be used to convict Petitioner to life in prison?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-01-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2019)
Attorneys
Jared Len Cruse
Jared Len Cruse — Petitioner