No. 19-493

James J. Maksimuk v. Connor Sport Court International, LLC

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2019-10-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (2)
Tags: cafc corporate-representation court-procedure district-court due-process equal-protection equal-protection-clause legal-counsel legal-representation overturning-decisions supreme-court-rulings trademark-cancellation trademark-law
Latest Conference: 2020-03-20 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Did the CAFC, District Court, 10th Cir., TTAB Orders and Judgments and referenced Supreme Court rulings —that required corporations to be represented by legal counsel in court rooms —violate the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process of Law and; should these Supreme Court rulings be amended or over-turned so to conform with the Equal Protection Clause? If so, should the CAFC, District Court, 10th Circuit, TTAB decisions be overturned?

2. Did the Dist. Court, 10th Cir. and CAFC exclude cumulative evidence, ignore Supreme Court rulings, U.S. Codes and Fed. R. Civ. P. in a prejudicial, bias and erroneously manner so to meet abuse of discretion standards? If so, should a retrial be granted in the proper venue?

3. Did the Dist. Court violate the 5th & 14th Amendments when it ruled that the Petitioner "is enjoined from using " the domain name?

4. Owning to the errors of law committed by the CAFC, Dist. Court, 10th Cir. and TTAB and the preponderance of evidence and referenced SC rulings, should the trademark 'sport court ' be cancelled and remove from the trademark Registry?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the CAFC, District Court, 10th Cir., TTAB orders and judgments and referenced Supreme Court rulings—that required corporations to be represented by legal counsel in court rooms—violate the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process of Law and; should these Supreme Court rulings be amended or over-turned so to conform with the Equal Protection Clause? If so, should the CAFC, District Court, 10th Cir., TTAB decisions be overturned?

Docket Entries

2020-03-23
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-02-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-06
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-10-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 18, 2019)

Attorneys

James Maksimuk
James J. Maksimuk — Petitioner