No. 19-363

Jim R. Nash v. Norma Nash, et al.

Lower Court: Arkansas
Docketed: 2019-09-18
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-courts fourteenth-amendment full-faith-and-credit jurisdiction personal-jurisdiction state-court state-courts substitution
Latest Conference: 2019-11-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) If several states following close versions of Rule 25
(FRCP) have held that judgments without jurisdiction
of the decedent are a nullity, and those same state
courts and at least two U.S. Circuit Courts have
condemned such treatment of the substitution process,
does judgment without jurisdiction here violate
petitioner's right to due process of law under the
Fourteenth Amendment?

2) The effects of state court judgments can cross many
borders. Are we allowing tactics in litigation to
circumvent the importance of personal jurisdiction?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a judgment without jurisdiction of the decedent violates the petitioner's right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment

Docket Entries

2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-15
Waiver of right of respondents Norma Nash, et al. to respond filed.
2019-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 18, 2019)

Attorneys

Jim Nash
J. R. NashNASH LAW FIRM, Petitioner
Norma Nash, et al.
Ed Daniel IVEd Daniel IV, P.A., Respondent