No. 19-359

In Re The Law Offices of Nina Ringgold, et al.

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-09-18
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: certificate-of-service civil-procedure civil-rights commercial-carrier due-process first-class-postage judicial-bias mandamus penalty-of-perjury recusal service standing supreme-court-rule third-party-carrier writ-of-mandamus
Latest Conference: 2019-12-06
Question Presented (from Petition)

Question not identified.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in denying the petitioners' request for a writ of mandamus to compel the district court to recuse itself from the underlying case

Docket Entries

2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-19
Application (19A555) denied by Justice Kagan.
2019-11-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-10-29
Application (19A555) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Main DocumentMain DocumentMain DocumentMain DocumentMain DocumentMain DocumentMain DocumentMain DocumentMain Document
2019-10-11
Waiver of right of respondents The Governor of the State of California, the Attorney General of the State of California, and the Commission on Judicial Performance of the State of California to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-09-16
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due October 18, 2019)
PetitionPetitionPetition

Attorneys

The Governor of the State of California, the Attorney General of the State of California, and the Commission on Judicial Performance of the State of California
Janill L. Richards — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
The Law Offices of Nina Ringgold
Nina R. Ringgold — Petitioner