No. 19-340
Carey D. Ebert v. John Paul DeJoria, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: aiding-and-abetting article-iii article-iii-standing bankruptcy bankruptcy-trustee breach-of-fiduciary-duty corporate-debt debtor-corporation fiduciary-duty judicial-proceedings standing trustee unpaid-debt
Latest Conference:
2019-11-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a bankruptcy trustee who proved at trial, without objection, that defendants' tortious conduct (breach of fiduciary duty and aiding and abetting claims) caused the debtor corporation to incur unpaid debt, has Article III standing to assert those claims.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a bankruptcy trustee who proved at trial, without objection, that defendants' tortious conduct (breach of fiduciary duty and aiding and abetting claims) caused the debtor corporation to incur unpaid debt, has Article III standing to assert those claims
Docket Entries
2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-07
Waiver of right of respondents Howard Miller Appel; Ernest A. Bartlett, III and Matthew J. Cohen to respond filed.
2019-09-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 16, 2019)
Attorneys
Carey D. Ebert
Howard Miller Appel; Ernest A. Bartlett, III and Matthew J. Cohen
Kenneth R. Shemin — Shemin Law Firm, PLLC, Respondent