1. Is it structural error and a denial of the Sixth Amendment right to "trial by an impartial jury" when the government expressly uses racial animus in a bribery trial by having an official government witness testify that people from India, like Petitioner Harshad Shah, are predisposed to bribery simply because they are Indian?

2. Given the injection of racial animus at trial, did the Ninth Circuit create a conflict with this Court's precedent denying Petitioner due process and a fair trial when it misapplied plain error review to a predisposition jury instruction that "seriously affect[ed] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings"?

Is the use of racial animus by the government in a bribery trial a structural error and a denial of the Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury?