No. 19-299
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-due-process domestic-violence due-process federal-jurisdiction government-surveillance international-law protection-from-abuse standing takings torture torture-allegations torture.
Key Terms:
Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-11-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
The case under review may superficially appear to be a simple protection from abuse case, although the Petitioner assures The Honorable United States Supreme Court that the Facts and Law pertinent to and directly associated with this case are far from simple, and involve deep matters of Constitutional Law as well as International Law that the Petitioner's own State's highest Court has refused to answer to due to "Want of Jurisdiction" and that therefore respectfully requires This Honorable Court's attention.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Petitioner's constitutional rights were violated due to alleged torture, surveillance, and lack of government protection
Docket Entries
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-08-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Glen D. Plourde
Glen D. Plourde — Petitioner