I. Whether it is constitutional to extend 18 U.S.C. § 2423(c) to noncommercial conduct allegedly committed by a foreign citizen and resident against other foreign citizens entirely within a foreign country.

II. Whether a defendant's exercise of his right to counsel of choice by timely requesting to substitute retained counsel may be circumscribed by the factors implicated in a request to substitute appointed counsel, or instead whether the right to retained counsel of choice must be honored in the absence of compelling justification.

Whether it is constitutional to extend 18 U.S.C. § 2423(c) to noncommercial conduct allegedly committed by a foreign citizen and resident against other foreign citizens entirely within a foreign country