No. 19-246

Massood Jallali v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2019-08-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: affirmative-defense brady-rule brady-violation-claim criminal-procedure discovery due-process evidence theory-of-innocence
Latest Conference: 2019-10-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT DEPARTED FROM THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF LAW IN DISCOVERY RULINGS THAT RESULTED IN A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE AND DEPRIVATION OF PETITIONER'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS?

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT'S DISCOVERY RULINGS DEPRIVED PETITIONER OF EVIDENCE UNDER BRADY THAT WOULD SUPPORT AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE AND PETITIONER'S THEORY OF INNOCENCE?

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT'S DISCOVERY RULINGS CAUSED PETITIONER IRREPARABLE INJURY WHICH WILL CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE REMAINDER OF THE CASE, IMPACTING THE IMPENDING TRIAL, LEAVING PETITIONER NO OTHER ADEQUATE REMEDY TO REVIEW THE DISCOVERY ORDERS, BUT CERTIORARI?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the trial court's discovery rulings deprived petitioner of evidence under Brady that would support an affirmative defense and petitioner's theory of innocence?

Docket Entries

2019-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
2019-09-25
Waiver of right of respondent State of Florida to respond filed.
2019-08-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 25, 2019)

Attorneys

Massood Jallali
Eugene H SteeleSteele Law Office, Petitioner
State of Florida
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent