Jack Rose, et ux. v. David Reaves, Chapter 7 Trustee
Whether courts considering an objection to discharge under Section 727(a)(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code should apply the narrowly tailored definition of "transferred" used in In re Adeeb, 787 F.2d 1339 (9th Cir. 1986), requiring that property be "transferred and remained transferred" as of the date of the petition, or the broad definition of "transfer" contained in Section 101(54) used by other provisions of the Bankruptcy Code to recover assets for the estate.
Whether courts considering an objection to discharge under Section 727(a)(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code should apply the narrowly tailored definition of 'transferred' used in In re Adeeb, 787 F.2d 1339 (9th Cir. 1986), requiring that property be 'transferred and remained transferred' as of the date of the petition, or the broad definition of 'transfer' contained in Section 101(54) used by other provisions of the Bankruptcy Code to recover assets for the estate