No. 19-229
C. D., By and Through Her Parents, M. D. and P. D., et al. v. Natick Public School District, et al.
Tags: circuit-split due-process educational-placement individuals-with-disabilities-education-act least-restrictive-environment mainstreaming mainstreaming-mandate regular-classes special-education supplementary-aids-and-services supplementary-aids-services
Latest Conference:
2020-02-28
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
When does a school district's decision to educate a child with disabilities outside the regular classroom violate the IDEA's mainstreaming mandate?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When does a school district's decision to educate a child with disabilities outside the regular classroom violate the IDEA's mainstreaming mandate?
Docket Entries
2020-03-02
Petition DENIED.
2020-02-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2019-12-31
Response Requested. (Due January 30, 2020)
2019-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-12-20
Reply of petitioners C.D., by and through her parents and next friends, M.D. and P.D., et al. filed. (Distributed)
2019-12-06
Brief of respondent Natick Public Schools in opposition filed.
2019-11-15
Waiver of right of respondent Masssachusetts Bureau of Special Education Appeals to respond filed.
2019-08-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 6, 2019, for all respondents.
2019-08-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 20, 2019 to December 6, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 20, 2019)
Attorneys
C.D., by and through her parents and next friends, M.D. and P.D., et al.
Shay Dvoretzky — Jones Day, Petitioner
Masssachusetts Bureau of Special Education Appeals
Elizabeth Napier Dewar — Respondent
Natick Public Schools
Felicia Simone Vasudevan — Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehane, LLP, Respondent