No. 19-20
William Andreoli, et al. v. Youngevity International Corporation, et al.
Tags: anti-SLAPP appellate-jurisdiction circuit-split civil-procedure collateral-order-doctrine final-judgment final-judgment-rule interlocutory-appeal slapp standing
Key Terms:
Arbitration FirstAmendment TradeSecret JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Arbitration FirstAmendment TradeSecret JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether federal courts of appeals lack interlocutory appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and the collateral order doctrine to review the denial of a motion to strike under a state anti-SLAPP statute, as the Second Circuit has held, or whether federal appellate courts have such jurisdiction as the Fifth and Ninth Circuits have held.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether federal courts of appeals lack interlocutory appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and the collateral order doctrine to review the denial of a motion to strike under a state anti-SLAPP statute
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-08-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-15
Reply of petitioners William Andreoli, et al. filed.
2019-08-01
Brief of respondents Youngevity International Corp., et al. in opposition filed.
2019-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 1, 2019)
Attorneys
William Andreoli, et al.
Jonathan O. Hafen — Parr Brown Gee & Loveless, Petitioner
Youngevity International Corp., et al.
Jonathan Walker Emord — Emord & Associates, Respondent