Daniel Delacruz, Sr. v. State Bar of California, et al.
Does a dismissal of claims based on the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and First Amendment rights under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine violate the equal protection clauses under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and the Fourteenth Amendment where; a state court had ruled that a settlement contract involving racial discrimination against Latinos lawfully restrains First Amendment rights; where a state court ordered that Petitioner must pay a related debt that was lawfully discharged in bankruptcy court; where discovery documents were withheld and destroyed; and, where there was a felony conviction for conspiracy to commit bank fraud that targeted Latinos?
Does a dismissal of claims based on the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and First Amendment rights under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine violate the equal protection clauses under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and the Fourteenth Amendment?