Whether the appellate court below erroneously held, in conflict with the decisions of this Court, and in a three-way split with the Third Circuit and Seventh Circuit, that the Plaintiffs injury to business and property in the United States resulting from RICO violations including extortion, mail fraud, and aiding & abetting is insufficient to satisfy the domestic injury requirement.

Whether the appellate court below erroneously held, in conflict with the decisions of this Court, and in a three-way split with the Third Circuit and Seventh Circuit, that the Plaintiff's injury to business and property in the United States resulting from RICO violations including extortion, mail fraud, and aiding & abetting is insufficient to satisfy the domestic injury requirement