No. 19-165
Daniel T. Morgan v. Sheri A. Morgan
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: alimony-contract appellate-court contract contract-interpretation due-process en-banc judicial-procedure jurisdiction jurisdiction-limitation overrule same-case
Latest Conference:
2019-10-11
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
No court has addressed this case's question:
Whether it is due process of law for an intermediate appellate court, not en banc, to overrule its decision in the same case.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether it is due process of law for an intermediate appellate court, not en banc, to overrule its decision in the same case
Docket Entries
2019-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-07
Application (19A143) denied by the Court.
2019-09-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-09-03
Waiver of right of respondent Sheri A. Morgan to respond filed.
2019-08-21
Application (19A143) referred to the Court.
2019-08-21
Application DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-16
Application (19A143) refiled and submitted to Justice Breyer.
2019-08-07
Application (19A143) denied by Justice Alito.
2019-08-05
Application (19A143) for a stay pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Alito.
2019-07-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 4, 2019)
Attorneys
Daniel T. Morgan
Anthony John Vetrano — Vetrano Vetrano & Feinman LLC, Petitioner
Sheri A. Morgan
John C. Hewett Jr. — Howett, Kissinger & Holst, P.C., Respondent