No. 19-148
7 West 57th Street Realty Company, LLC v. Citigroup, Inc., et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: antitrust-standing clayton-act financial-instruments libor market-manipulation price-fixing privity-relationship
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether an antitrust plaintiff with a direct privity relationship to a price-fixer has antitrust standing under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15, when it was injured by its participation in a market that was foreseeably affected by defendants' anti-competitive manipulation of a directly related market.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an antitrust plaintiff with a direct privity relationship to a price-fixer has antitrust standing under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15, when it was injured by its participation in a market that was foreseeably affected by defendants' anticompetitive manipulation of a directly related market
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-23
Waiver of right of respondents Citigroup, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2019-07-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 30, 2019)
Attorneys
7 West 57th Street Realty Company, LLC
Sarah Elaine Harrington — Goldstein & Russell, P.C., Petitioner
Citigroup, Inc., et al.
Beth Susan Brinkmann — Covington & Burling, Respondent