1. Whether the injunction enforcing the hush agreements and sealing the evidence of Aflac's and Dan Amos' cover-up of Dr. Amos' serial assaults upon women, upheld by the Eleventh Circuit without the balancing test required by Rumery, violates the First Amendment?

2. Whether the Eleventh Circuit's affirmation of the District Judge's refusal to recuse himself despite his familial and social ties to each of the five defendants and his spouse's interests in the subject matter has violated the Due Process Clause's guarantee of "an impartial and disinterested tribunal," Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc., 446 U.S. 238, 242 (1980), and/or "so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings . . . as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power" within the meaning of Rule 10(a) of the Court's Rules?

Whether the injunction enforcing the hush agreements and sealing the evidence of Aflac's and Dan Amos' cover-up of Dr. Amos' serial assaults upon women, upheld by the Eleventh Circuit without the balancing test required by Rumery, violates the First Amendment?