No. 19-1441
City of Austin, Texas v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas, et al.
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: civil-rights declaratory-judgment due-process eleventh-amendment ex-parte-young federal-jurisdiction federal-preemption preemption standing state-preemption supremacy-clause
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Under Ex parte Young, is a state official a proper defendant in a federal declaratory judgment challenge under the Supremacy Clause to the validity of a self-enforcing state statute, if the official with authority to enforce the statute has not yet overtly threatened enforcement?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Under Ex parte Young, is a state official a proper defendant in a federal declaratory judgment challenge under the Supremacy Clause to the validity of a self-enforcing state statute, if the official with authority to enforce the statute has not yet overtly threatened enforcement?
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-09
Reply of petitioner City of Austin, Texas filed. (Distributed)
2020-12-01
Brief of respondent Paxton, Att'y Gen. of TX in opposition filed.
2020-11-02
Supplemental brief of petitioner City of Austin, Texas filed.
2020-09-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 1, 2020.
2020-09-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 2, 2020 to December 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-09-02
Response Requested. (Due October 2, 2020)
2020-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-13
Waiver of right of respondent Paxton, Att'y Gen. of TX to respond filed.
2020-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 30, 2020)
Attorneys
City of Austin, Texas
Renea Hicks — Law Office of Max Renea Hicks, Petitioner
Paxton, Att'y Gen. of TX
Kyle Douglas Hawkins — Texas Attorney General's Office, Respondent