No. 19-1439

Joey Jurgensen v. Michael R. Pompeo, Secretary of State, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-01
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: agency-review civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-access-to-justice-act judicial-imprimatur legal-relationship prevailing-party standing sua-sponte-stay
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Immigration Privacy
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

In Buckhannon Bd. and Care Home, Inc. v. W. Va. Dep't of Health, 532 U.S. 598, 605 (2001), this Court established that one may qualify as a "prevailing party" under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA") without securing a final judgment. The Court provided some guidance as to the amount of judicial involvement that would suffice as a requisite "judicial imprimatur," but defining its scope continues to divide the lower courts.

Whether a sua sponte stay ordered by the trial court, which directs the Agency to "repair" the concerns and to "finish" another review as sought by a plaintiff, who ultimately achieves virtually all of the relief requested without a final judgment or settlement, satisfies EAJA's "prevailing party" requirement.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a sua sponte stay ordered by the trial court, which directs the Agency to 'repair' the concerns and to 'finish' another review as sought by a plaintiff, who ultimately achieves virtually all of the relief requested without a final judgment or settlement, satisfies EAJA's 'prevailing party' requirement

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-16
Waiver of right of respondents Pompeo, Michael, et al. to respond filed.
2020-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 31, 2020)

Attorneys

Joey Jurgensen
Eric S. MontalvoFederal Practice Group, Petitioner
Pompeo, Michael, et al.
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent