No. 19-1424
Response Waived
Tags: bank-fraud criminal-procedure due-process jury-instructions materiality restitution seventh-circuit strickland strickland-claim strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Was the omission of the concept of materiality from the bank fraud elements instruction error requiring a new trial?
2. Did the Seventh Circuit erroneously deny a Strickland claim to a restitution judgment brought on direct appeal?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the omission of the concept of materiality from the bank fraud elements instruction error requiring a new trial?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States, et al. to respond filed.
2020-06-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 27, 2020)
Attorneys
Kevin LeBeau
Damon Matthew Cheronis — Law Office of Damon M. Cher.onis, Petitioner
United States, et al.
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent