No. 19-1410
Rosetta Bulluck v. Newtek Small Business Finance, Inc., dba Newtek Business Services, Inc., et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights common-law-doctrine contract-formation contract-implementation deference-to-district-court due-process foreclosure-sale private-right-of-action standing summary-judgment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether granting summary judgment in favor of
Respondents and dismissing Petitioner's case was
improper when the District Court deemed that, among
other things, Petitioner had no private right of action
for Respondents' unlawful acts.
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in failing to
examine the District Court's summary judgment
findings as it pertains to contract formation and
implementation and wrongfully gave complete
deference to the District Court.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner has a private right of action for Respondents' unlawful acts
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-08
Waiver of right of respondent FDIC to respond filed.
2020-06-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 24, 2020)
Attorneys
FDIC
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Rosetta Bulluck
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner