No. 19-1395
Raleigh Rogers v. Discover Bank
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure due-process fraud misconduct misrepresentation new-trial north-carolina-rules pro-se relief-from-judgment
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
DOES "PRO SE" MEAN "NO SAY " OR ARE EVEN PRO SE LITIGANTS ELIGIBLE FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT AND A NEW TRIAL PURSUANT NC §1A- 1RULE 60(b)(3) WHEN COURTS IN NORTH CAROLINA ALLOW LICENSED OPPOSING COUNSEL TO COMMIT FRAUD, MISREPRESENTATION, AND MISCONDUCT?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does 'pro se' mean 'no say' or are even pro se litigants eligible for relief from judgment and a new trial pursuant NC §14-1 Rule 60(b)(3) when courts in North Carolina allow licensed opposing counsel to commit fraud, misrepresentation, and misconduct?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent Discover Bank to respond filed.
2020-06-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 20, 2020)
Attorneys
Discover Bank
Raleigh Rogers
Raleigh Rogers — Petitioner