No. 19-1387
Waseem Daker v. Theodore Jackson, Sheriff, Fulton County, Georgia, et al.
Tags: access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-challenge first-amendment free-speech in-forma-pauperis prison-litigation-reform-act religious-exercise three-strikes three-strikes-provision
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment DueProcess
FirstAmendment DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether the Prison Litigation Reform Act "three-strikes" provision, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), is unconstitutional as applied to deny a prisoner access to courts with which to vindicate First Amendment rights.
II. Whether the Prison Litigation Reform Act "three-strikes" provision, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), violates the First Amendment "breathing space" principle.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Prison Litigation Reform Act 'three-strikes' provision, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), is unconstitutional as applied to deny a prisoner access to courts with which to vindicate First Amendment rights
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 20, 2020)
2020-02-25
Application (19A945) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until June 13, 2020.
2020-02-19
Application (19A945) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 14, 2020 to June 13, 2020, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Waseem Daker
Waseem Daker — Petitioner