No. 19-1380
Terry Lynn Olson v. Janis Amatuzio, et al.
Tags: circuit-split civil-procedure civil-rights due-process habeas habeas-corpus heck-doctrine heck-v-humphrey incarceration incarceration-challenge section-1983
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a petitioner who has no available remedy in habeas, through no lack of diligence on his part, is barred by Heck from pursuing a Section 1983 claim challenging the validity or duration of his incarceration.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a petitioner who has no available remedy in habeas, through no lack of diligence on his part, is barred by Heck from pursuing a Section 1983 claim challenging the validity or duration of his incarceration
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-04
Reply of petitioner Terry Lynn Olson filed. (Distributed)
2020-07-16
Brief of respondent Janis Amatuzio in opposition filed.
2020-07-15
Brief of respondents Paul Schnell, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-06-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 16, 2020)
Attorneys
Janis Amatuzio
Paul Schnell, Tom Roy, and Joan Fabian
Angela Behrens — Minnesota Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Terry Lynn Olson
Erica Ashley Holzer — Maslon LLP, Petitioner