1. Do Mireles v. Waco, Brookings v. Clunk,
and associated case law combine to grant
absolute judicial immunity to all other regulation,
Section 1983 suits, the authority of superior
Courts, and federal law based on jurisdiction
alone as implied by the Sixth Circuit 's decision?

2. By extension, do absolute judicial
immunity, Rooker-Feldman Doctrine (relied upon
in the District Court 's decision), and 28 U.S.C.
Section 1257 unconstitutionally combine to
abridge the right to Due Process and Equal
Treatment by effectively barring access to higher
Courts for remedy to State Courts ' of last resort,
or to intermediate courts ', violations of
constitutional guarantees?

Do Mireles v. Waco, Brookings v. Clunk, and associated case law combine to grant absolute judicial immunity to all other regulation, Section 1988 suits, the authority of superior Courts, and federal law based on jurisdiction alone as implied by the Sixth Circuit's decision?