DueProcess ClassAction JusticiabilityDoctri
(1) The Scope Of Complete Exclusive Jurisdictional Authority of the United States Tax Court Under Article I of The United States Constitution Upon Title 26, U.S.C Section 7441 from 1979 thru 2015; where extraordinary, unprecedented, and special interest circumstances of "[C]ash quid-pro-quo fashion in exchange for Court Decisions) from the Tax Court and the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Macon Division, Macon, Georgia; in Consecutive Phases; by Chief District Court Judge Wilbur D. Owens, Junior, from 1985 thru 1999; and Chief District Court Judge C. Ashley Royal, from 2000 thru 2015; upon Appointed Limited Special Trial Judge Continuance from Chief Tax Court Judge Joel Gerbur by His Title 26, U.S.C. , Section 7443A Tax Court Authority.
(2) The Scope Of Complete Jurisdictional Authority Of The United States District Court for the District Of Columbia, Judge Amit P. Mehta, Term-Time, Jurisdiction Quasi In Rem; The Power of A Court Over Plaintiff's Interests in Property (meaning Awarded but not Paid Income Tax Refunds and Middleman Fees; Title 26, U.S.C., Sections 162 and 6045(a) and (b) , respectively); Civil Complaint Number 1:15-cv-01685 (APM) ; For Final Judgment Order and Payment Order(s) presented therein where Cognizable Jurisdiction Quasi In Rem was accepted; docketed; and adjudicated with Instructions and Warnings to The Defendant Chief District Court Judge C. Ashley Royal; "[W]ho Defaulted by Not Filing an Answer or Reply, which is synonymous with the term 'Guilty As Charged'; but Judge Mehta 'Refused to Acquiesce To; Honor; and Enforce His Transaction Promised which Denied Petitioners Procedural Due Process Rights for Judge Mehta's Miscarriage of Justice.
Scope of United States Tax Court jurisdiction under Article I