1. Respondent created Court Technicality reiterated false
claim, incarcerated prisoner, common law originated U.S.
Court Federal Claims case 04CV226! no legal merit False
Claims litigation Case 04CV226 USCFC technicality no legal
standing in a limited court jurisdiction Tucker Act: does
Respondent void right to fair trial equated free U S citizens as
incarcerated prisoners, established guilty without being
heard, no trial, Respondent practiced English law is it
constitutional?

2 Court reiterated origin USCFC technicality voids right to
file grievance, suppressed evidence of grievance to be heard,
enabled Respondent denies Reexamination Clause, Court
Technicality enabled suspend Bill of Rights without due
process by issuance common law voids complaint without due
process, suppressed evidence never to be heard.' is this court
technicality a direct violation of Ninth Amendment ?

3. Courts routinely used incarcerated prisoner common law
doctrine^ does it obstruct due process Clause Fifth Fourteenth
Amendments alters U S government from within voids
Guarantee Clause U S Constitution enables Office of
President agencies alter law arbitrarily be above the law
enabled certified fraud legal; decisions outside jurisdiction
U.S Constitution voids Republic? Yes or no

Does the respondent's creation of a court technicality that reiterated a false claim, incarcerated the prisoner, and originated from a U.S. Court of Federal Claims case with no legal merit, void the petitioner's right to a fair trial and equate free U.S. citizens as incarcerated prisoners?