1. Which one of the two differing standards, the D.C. Circuit's "Unfettered Discretion" standard or the Ninth and Tenth Circuits' "Rational Basis Test" standard, is appropriate for evaluating dismissal pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3730(c)(2)(A)?

2. Did the Third Circuit sidestep important constitutional questions regarding the above-referenced circuit split by misconstruing Relator's explicit demands on the record that the District Court adopt the Ninth and Tenth Circuits' standard over the D.C. Circuit standard for evaluating dismissal pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3730(c)(2)(A)?

3. Did the Third Circuit fail to recognize the record below that the District Court enabled legal malpractice of Relator's attorneys by denying their first motion to withdraw as counsel to the extent that they failed to request a hearing pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3730(c)(2)(A)?

Which one of the two differing standards, the D.C. Circuit's 'Unfettered Discretion' standard or the Ninth and Tenth Circuits' 'Rational Basis Test' standard, is appropriate for evaluating dismissal pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3730(c)(2)(A)?