1.Did the Defendants in l:15-cv-12870, acting singular ly or in concert, criminally falsify the per curiam of the Michigan Court of Appeals docket No. 304639, thereby denying the Petitioner his civil rights?

2.Did Judge Murphy, in his administrative position, by refusal to inquire into the actions of his subordinates in l:15-cv-12870, become complicate in the cover-up?

3. Did the Michigan Supreme Court, or their staff, by denying the Petitioner's leave to appeal, become complicate in the cover-up of the Michigan Court of Appeals falsification?

4.Did Magistrate Judge Patricia Morris, through her re peated campaigns of snips and quips, misdirection, misin formation, obfuscation, and selective misuse of quota tions in the three prior actions, unduly influence Judge Ludington 's ORDER?

5.Has Judge Ludington become so wedded to his biased positions in the three prior actions, upset with Meitzner 's repeated motion to recuse M J Morris, embarrassed with his case manager's (17) day late mailing, as to lose the objectivity needed to form an impartial opinion in Meitzner v. Schuette ?

6.Has the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit become complacent - ride with the tide, go with the flow - in allowing Judge Ludington 's ORDERS to be affirmed?

7.Has the United States Supreme Court allowed itself to become embroiled in this civil rights conspiracy through the Machiavellian manipulations of its staff?

Did the Defendants in 1:15-cv-12870, acting singularly or in concert, criminally falsify the per curiam of the Michigan Court of Appeals docket No. 304639, thereby denying the Petitioner his civil rights?