Did the Arizona Supreme Court have subject matter to grant jurisdiction for attorney's fees on behalf of an appellee after it declined to grant review; (2) alternatively, did the Arizona Supreme Court have jurisdiction to grant attorney's fees in favor of an appellee who failed to file a cross-appeal?

Did the Canadian defendant waive its right to personal jurisdiction under the contacts test, by its choice of law of Ontario, Canada, which has a less minimum stringent test for invoking personal jurisdiction?

Did the Arizona Supreme Court have subject matter jurisdiction to grant attorney's fees on behalf of an appellee after it declined to grant review; alternatively, did the Arizona Supreme Court have jurisdiction to grant attorney's fees in favor of an appellee who failed to file a cross-appeal?