Question 1. Whether a supervising Deputy District Attorney who assigned three (4) District Attorneys over a two-year period to a case that lacked probable cause (per discovery) to prosecute entitled to absolute immunity under 42 U.S.C § 1983?

Question 2. Whether the lower courts biaslv abused their discretion by mischaracterizing the duties of a supervising Deputy District Attorney?

Question 3. Whether the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals Court with disturbing ease exploited their discretion by failing to mention the true context of the Petitioners statements. Said statement being "knew of exculpatory evidence and failed to act" by intentionally rcontinuing a prosecution for 26 months. Willis "knew" was not supported by the Constitution or the Bar Associations Rules of Conduct and Ethics or acknowledge Willis was an administer/supervisor never the prosecuting attorney.

Question 4. Whether the lower courts abused their discretion by biasly revisiting a judgment of another court and applied it to this unique case?

Question 1. Whether the rulings by the 7,h. 6th, and 2mi Circuits should serve as an established guideline for Respondents who have received a reasonably calculated notification to defend a suit and make general appearances and litigate, Nonetheless attempt to under mind said notice by hiding behind a rule that is secondary to the concept it is predicated on (which is notification and an opportunity to respond)?

Question 2. Whether the lower courts abused their discretion by purposely not taking into consideration that the Respondent 's motions (District court documents 9.13,16. and 22) substantially litigated every defense from expiration of the statute of limitations, to sovereignty, and immunities?

Question 3. Whether the lower courts abused their discretion by not considering the Petitioners amended complaints first page statement "Plaintiff seeks to amend the original complaint to assist and clarify statements and claims" as a reasonable expectation that Respondents can defend the lawsuit?

Question 1. Whether service of the amended complaint to the attorney on record per Federal Rule o (b) (1) satisfied the constitution's 14th amendment requirements for due process pertaining to notice?

Question 2. Whether the lower courts biasly exploited their

Whether a supervising Deputy District Attorney who assigned three (4) District Attorneys over a two-year period to a case that lacked probable cause (per discovery) to prosecute was entitled to absolute immunity under 42 U.S.C § 1983?