No. 19-126

Gary A. Oram, Jr. v. City of Dillon, Montana, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-07-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 42-usc-1985 civil-procedure civil-rights double-jeopardy due-process fair-trial judicial-resolution liability magistrate-jurisdiction private-citizen section-1985 standing
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Are the Courts able to find a judicial resolution in a §1985(3) claim against one private citizen, after all other individuals in the action are released from liability?

2. Is it a violation of fair and impartial rights, if magistrate is denied jurisdiction by a party then acts to deny a motion magistrate has no authority to approve of, pursuant to the scope in 28 U.S.C. §636. The Tenth Circuit has found these acts to void the proceeding. In the above entitled the Ninth Circuit's opinions conflict with this precedence. Which court is correct in its application of law?

3. Is it constitutional pursuant to double jeopardy laws to punish an individual twice for the same offense?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Are the Courts able to find a judicial resolution in a §1985(3) claim against one private citizen, after all other individuals in the action are released from liability?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-08
Waiver of right of respondents Ceth Haggard and Jeremy Avarez to respond filed.
2019-06-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2019)

Attorneys

Ceth Haggard and Jeremy Avarez
Cynthia Lynn WalkerPoore, Roth & Robinson, P.C., Respondent
Gary Oram
Gary Oram Jr. — Petitioner