No. 19-1255
Renee Baker, Warden, et al. v. Jeff N. Rose
Tags: aedpa credibility criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-evidence-admissibility due-process evidence evidentiary-ruling habeas-corpus impeachment nevada-v-jackson ninth-circuit prior-acquittals state-court-review
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Ninth Circuit's decision violates AEDPA, given that this Court reversed the Ninth Circuit under materially similar circumstances in Nevada v. Jackson, 569 U.S. 505, 509 (2013).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit's decision violates AEDPA
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-14
Reply of petitioners Renee Baker, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-07-01
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Jeff N. Rose.
2020-07-01
Brief of respondent Jeff N. Rose in opposition filed.
2020-05-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 1, 2020.
2020-05-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 1, 2020 to July 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-04-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 1, 2020)
2020-02-20
Application (19A915) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 25, 2020.
2020-02-14
Application (19A915) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 24, 2020 to March 25, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Jeff N. Rose
Amelia L. Bizzaro — Federal Public Defender, District of Nevada, Respondent
Renee Baker, et al.
Heidi Jill Parry Stern — Office of the Nevada Attorney General, Petitioner