I. DID THE COURT BELOW FAIL TO USE AN
APPROPRIATE STANDARD OF REVIEW
WHEN GRANTING ALL THE DISMISSAL
MOTIONS WITHOUT RECOGNIZING THE
PETITIONER 'S EVIDENCE?

II. DID THE COURT BELOW BY FAILING TO
GRANT THE PETITIONER A TRIAL CREATE
A SERIERS OF REVERSABLE ERRORS AS
THE UNITED STATES SIMULTANEOUSLY
FILED IT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AS A
DEFENDANT WHILE ELECTING TO NOT
INTERVENE AS A QUI TAM PLAINTIFF?

III. DID THE DISTRICT COURT DENY THE
PETITIONER 'S MOTION FOR JUDGEMENT
BY DEFAULT CREATE A REVERSABLE
ERROR?

IV. DID THE DISTRICT COURT MAKE A
REVERSABLE ERROR BY ALLOWING A
VIOLATION OF THE STATE 'S LAW THAT
STRICTLY PROHIBITED THE S.C. STATE 'S
INSURANCE FUND ATTORNEYS TO
REPRESENT A PRIVATE BUSINESS 'S
INDIVIDUAL OWNER? CRICHARDSON, JR)

V. DID THE DISTRICT COURT CREATE A
REVERSABLE ERROR CHANGING THE
NAME OF RICHARDSON TO RICHARDSON,
SR. WHO WAS DECEASED 9 YEAR PRIOR TO
"AT ALL TIMES PERTINENT TO THE CASE "?

VI. DID THE DISTRICT COURT CREATE A
REVERSABLE ERROR TO GRANT
DEFENDANT CHENEGA SECURITY AND
THORPE FIRST MOTION TO DISMISS BY
SUBSITUTING THE SECOND MOTION TO
DISMISS USING THE ROSEBORO ORDER
WARNING OF THE SECOND ON THE FIRST
ONE FILED (7) MONTHS EARLIER W/O THE
ROSEBORO ORDER NOTICE TO PRO SE?

VIL DOES THE DISTRICT COURT CREATE A
REVERSABLE ERROR WITH USE OF A
FEDERAL EMPLOYED GHOSTWRITER
ATTORNEY BETWEEN CHAMBERS IN THIS
DISTRICT COURTS IN-HOUSE SECRETELY
ASSIGNED TO ALL PRO SE CASES?

VIIL DID THE DISTRICT COURT GRANT
MOTIONS TO DISMISS IGNORING THE
VALUE AND WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE
THE PETITIONER FILED UNDISPUTED
PHOTO AND A FLETC INVESTIGATION
REPORT CAUSE A REVERSABLE ERROR?

IX. DID THE DISTRICT COURT CREATE A
REVERSABLE ERROR TO IGNORE THE
EVIDENCE THAT THE UNITED STATES
PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT WAS USED
TO CREATE A UNLAWFUL VAULE
CONVERTED INTO A PRIVATE
DEFENDANT BENEFIT AND PROFITS?

X. DID THE DISTRICT COURT CREATE A
REVERSABLE ERROR TO IGNORE THE
UNITED STATES CONTRACT TECHNICAL
REPRESENTATIVE 'S TESTIMONY THAT
THE PETITIONER WAS "WRONGED
METHODICALLY ' - WHILE THE COURT OF
APPEALS GRANTED TO ADMIT THIS
EVIDENCE INTO THE RECORD; THEN IT
DENIED TO REMAND FOR A TRIAL?

XI. DID THE DISTRICT COURT CREATE A
REVERSABLE ERROR IN FAILING TO
PROTECT THE PETITONER FROM
RETALLIATION AS THE ORIGINAL

Did the court below fail to use an appropriate standard of review when granting all the dismissal motions without recognizing the petitioner's evidence?