1. Whether the Tenth Circuit improperly found, failing to apply this Court's authority and contrary to other courts of appeals and other of its own prior decisions, sufficient evidence for Mr. Hammers to be convicted of conspiracy based solely upon inferences the jury could have drawn from his executive position at the school and his association with Keeling.

2. Whether the Tenth Circuit's decision to exclude the Note was contrary to Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284, 302 (1973) and its progeny in that it never gave any consideration to the exculpatory nature of the Note in its evidentiary analysis.

Whether the Tenth Circuit improperly found sufficient evidence for Mr. Hammers to be convicted of conspiracy based solely upon inferences from his executive position and association