Is the following question one that jurists of reason would find debatable?

Does the total prohibition on the exercise of a person's fundamental Second Amendment right to keep a firearm in one's home for purposes of self-defense constitute the type of "severe restraint on liberty" described in Hensley v. Municipal Court, 411 U.S. 345, 351 (1973) which satisfies the habeas corpus custody requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a)?

Does the total prohibition on the exercise of a person's fundamental Second Amendment right to keep a firearm in one's home for purposes of self-defense constitute the type of 'severe restraint on liberty' described in Hensley v. Municipal Court, 411 US. 345, 351 (1973) which satisfies the habeas corpus custody requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a)?