No. 19-120
IBG LLC, et al. v. Trading Technologies International, Inc.
Response Waived
Tags: america-invents-act covered-business-method federal-circuit federal-circuit-split patent-eligibility patent-review patent-validity statutory-interpretation technological-invention
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Patent Trademark JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw Patent Trademark JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a patent that does not satisfy the first prong of § 42.301(b)—that is, that does not recite a novel and non-obvious technological feature—claims a "technological invention" under AIA § 18(d).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a patent that does not satisfy the first prong of § 42.301(b)—that is, that does not recite a novel and non-obvious technological feature—claims a 'technological invention' under AIA § 18(d)
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-30
Supplemental brief of petitioner IBG LLC and Interactive Brokers LLC filed. (Distributed)
2019-09-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-23
Waiver of right of respondent Trading Technologies International, Inc. to respond filed.
2019-08-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2019)
Attorneys
IBG LLC and Interactive Brokers LLC
Robert Evan Sokohl — Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C, Petitioner
Trading Technologies International, Inc.
Michael David Gannon — Baker & Hostetler LLP, Respondent
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent