No. 19-118
Intermessage Communications, Inc. v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights damages due-process legal-remedy ohio-supreme-court remedy standing wrongful-conduct
Key Terms:
Antitrust DueProcess ClassAction JusticiabilityDoctri
Antitrust DueProcess ClassAction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the o hio s upreme c ourt has violated
petitioners' due process rights by interpreting o hio law in
a way that prevents individuals who have been harmed by
conduct found by that c ourt to be wrongful/illegal, from
having any avenue to pursue any remedy for damages caused by that wrongful conduct.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ohio Supreme Court has violated Petitioners' due process rights
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership to respond filed.
2019-07-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2019)
2019-05-16
Application (18A1184) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until July 22, 2019.
2019-05-14
Application (18A1184) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 21, 2019 to July 20, 2019, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership
Benjamin Creighton Sasse — Tucker Ellis LLP, Respondent
intermessage communications, inc.
Dennis Robert Rose — Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP, Petitioner