No. 19-1114

National Collegiate Athletic Association, et al. v. New Jersey Thoroughbred Horsemen's Association, Inc.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2020-03-11
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-procedure damages equitable-discretion federal-rules-of-civil-procedure injunction injunction-bond permanent-injunction rule-65(c) rule-65c sports-gambling temporary-restraining-order
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-05-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether a party was "wrongfully enjoined" under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c) when the district court confirmed via the grant of a permanent injunction that its entry of a temporary restraining order was correct under then-applicable law.

2. Whether a district court retains its full equitable discretion to deny recovery on a Rule 65(c) injunction bond.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a party was 'wrongfully enjoined' under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c) when the district court confirmed via the grant of a permanent injunction that its entry of a temporary restraining order was correct under then-applicable law

Docket Entries

2020-05-18
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-27
Reply of petitioners National Collegiate Athletic Association, an unincorporated association, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-04-09
Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until April 28, 2020, granted.
2020-04-08
Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from April 15, 2020 to April 28, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-03-30
Brief of respondent New Jersey Thoroughbred Horsemen's Assoc. in opposition filed.
2020-03-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 10, 2020)

Attorneys

National Collegiate Athletic Association, an unincorporated association, et al.
Paul D. ClementKirkland & Ellis LLP, Petitioner
New Jersey Thoroughbred Horsemen's Assoc.
Ronald J. RiccioMcElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, Respondent