No. 19-1076
John L. Corrigan, Jr. v. City of Savage, Minnesota, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: 1983-claim 42-usc-1983 civil-procedure civil-rights custody due-process favorable-termination habeas habeas-corpus heck-doctrine heck-v-humphrey incarceration judicial-precedent section-1983 spencer-v-kemna standing
Latest Conference:
2020-05-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the court below erroneously held, in conflict with the decisions of seven other circuits, that the favorable termination rule applies even if an individual is no longer incarcerated, and therefore ineligible for habeas relief.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court below erroneously held that the favorable termination rule applies even if an individual is no longer incarcerated, and therefore ineligible for habeas relief
Docket Entries
2020-05-04
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.
2020-03-25
Waiver of right of respondents Assistant County Attorney Nelson Rhodus, Scott County Sheriff Luke Hennen, Probation Officer Lynn Hanson, Scott County to respond filed.
2020-03-18
Waiver of right of respondents City of Savage, Police Officer, Kerkaert, et al. to respond filed.
2020-03-11
Waiver of right of respondent Judge Christian Wilton to respond filed.
2020-02-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 1, 2020)
Attorneys
Assistant County Attorney Nelson Rhodus, Scott County Sheriff Luke Hennen, Probation Officer Lynn Hanson, Scott County
Anna Lynn Yunker — Everett & VanderWiel, P.L.L.P., Respondent
City of Savage, Police Officer, Kerkaert, et al.
Ryan M. Zipf — League Minnesota West, Respondent
John L. Corrigan, Jr.
John L. Corrigan Jr. — Petitioner
Judge Christian Wilton