No. 19-1075
Bryan Adrian Copeland v. United States
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights district-court due-process eleventh-circuit fifth-amendment habeas habeas-corpus habeas-review ineffective-assistance-of-counsel martinez-v-ryan miller-el-v-cockrell strickland-v-washington
Latest Conference:
2020-04-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred in affirming the
District Court and denying Copeland a Certificate
of Appealability for § 2255 habeas review when the
court departed from the threshold prescribed in
Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322 (2003).
2. Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred in affirming the
District Court's decision that Copeland did not
make a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred in affirming the District Court and denying Copeland a Certificate of Appealability for § 2255 habeas review
Docket Entries
2020-04-06
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-03-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-02-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 1, 2020)
Attorneys
Bryan Adrian Copeland
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent