No. 19-1062
CJ CheilJedang Corp., et al. v. International Trade Commission, et al.
Amici (1)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: claim-amendment doctrine-of-equivalents festo-corp-v-shoketsu innovation patent-infringement patent-law prosecution-history-estoppel public-notice public-notice-function tangential-relation
Key Terms:
Patent Jurisdiction
Patent Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2020-06-18
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, to avoid prosecution history estoppel under Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., "the rationale underlying the amendment" must be the rationale the patentee provided to the public at the time of the amendment.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, to avoid prosecution history estoppel under Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 'the rationale underlying the amendment' must be the rationale the patentee provided to the public at the time of the amendment
Docket Entries
2020-06-22
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.
2020-06-01
Reply of petitioners CJ CheilJedang Corp., et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-05-21
Brief of respondents International Trade Commission, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-05-21
Brief of respondents Ajinomoto Co., Inc., Ajinomoto Animal Nutrition North America, Inc. in opposition filed.
2020-05-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 21, 2020, for all respondents.
2020-05-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 11, 2020 to May 21, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-04-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 11, 2020.
2020-04-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 27, 2020 to May 11, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-03-26
Brief amicus curiae of R Street Institute filed.
2020-03-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 27, 2020, for all respondents.
2020-03-11
Motion of respondents Ajinomoto Co., et al. to extend the time to file a response from March 27, 2020 to April 27, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-02-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 27, 2020)
Attorneys
Ajinomoto Co., Inc., Ajinomoto Animal Nutrition North America, Inc.
CJ CheilJedang Corp., et al.
Douglas Harry Hallward-Driemeier — Ropes & Gray, LLP, Petitioner
International Trade Commission, et al.
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
R Street Institute
Charles Duan — R Street Institute, Amicus