No. 19-1059
Angela Hamm, et vir v. Tennessee
Amici (1)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: 4th-amendment fourth-amendment home-invasion home-search law-enforcement-search privacy privacy-rights probation probation-condition reasonable-suspicion search-and-seizure warrantless-search
Latest Conference:
2020-06-25
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether police violate the Fourth Amendment when they conduct a suspicionless search of a probationer's home.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether police violate the Fourth Amendment when they conduct a suspicionless search of a probationer's home
Docket Entries
2020-06-29
Petition DENIED.
2020-06-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.
2020-06-05
Reply of petitioners Angela Hamm, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-05-22
Brief of respondent State of Tennessee in opposition filed.
2020-04-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 22, 2020.
2020-04-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 24, 2020 to May 22, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-03-27
Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed.
2020-03-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 24, 2020.
2020-03-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 27, 2020 to April 24, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-02-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 27, 2020)
Attorneys
Angela Hamm, et al.
Ilana Hope Eisenstein — DLA Piper LLP (US), Petitioner
State of Tennessee
The Rutherford Institute