No. 19-103
StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. v. SecureAuth Corporation
Tags: 35-usc-101 alice-corp-v-cls-bank alice-test berkheimer-v-hp federal-circuit inventive-concept patent-eligibility patent-subject-matter step-two-analysis well-understood-routine-and-conventional well-understood-routine-conventional
Key Terms:
Antitrust Patent
Antitrust Patent
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Federal Circuit conducted the proper analysis under step two of Alice, as this Court will explain it, should certiorari be granted in Berkheimer SCT.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Federal Circuit conducted the proper analysis under step two of Alice, as this Court will explain it, should certiorari be granted in Berkheimer SCT
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-09-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-08-30
Reply of petitioner StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. filed.
2019-08-20
Brief of respondent SecureAuth Corporation in opposition filed.
2019-07-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 21, 2019)
2019-05-09
Application (18A1157) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until July 19, 2019.
2019-05-08
Application (18A1157) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 20, 2019 to July 19, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
SecureAuth Corporation
Stephen Wayne Larson — Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, Respondent
StrikeForce Technologies, Inc.
Salvatore Paul Tamburo — Blank Rome LLP, Petitioner