1. Whether a district court granting an ends-ofjustice continuance under the Speedy Trial Act of
1974, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), violates the requirement that the court set forth its reasons for "such
continuance" when it sets forth adequate reasons only
for earlier continuances.

2. Whether, at the sentencing of a fraud defendant
whose conduct the district court found included both
"pervasive" fraud and legitimate activities, the government retains the burden of proving the specific scope
of the fraudulent conduct that results in loss under the
Sentencing Guidelines, restitution, and forfeiture.

Whether a district court granting an ends-of-justice continuance under the Speedy Trial Act violates the requirement to set forth reasons