No. 19-1005
Hotze Health Wellness Center International One, LLC, et al. v. Environmental Research Center, Inc.
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction appellate-procedure article-iii-standing circuit-precedent en-banc-review federal-rules federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure intra-circuit-splits jurisdictional-dismissal local-appellate-rules local-rules motions-panel subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2020-05-15
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Ninth Circuit's local rules for en banc review violate FED. R. APP. P. 47(a)(1) by allowing a three-judge motions panel to deny en banc review for the en banc court, which conflicts with FED. R. APP. P. 35(a)(1)'s provisions for en banc review.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit's local rules for en banc review violate FED. R. APP. P. 47(a)(1) by allowing a three-judge motions panel to deny en banc review for the en banc court, which conflicts with FED. R. APP. P. 35(a)(1)'s provisions for en banc review
Docket Entries
2020-05-18
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-17
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-03-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-02-28
Supplemental brief of petitioner Hotze Health & Wellness Center International One, L.L.C. filed.
2020-02-25
Waiver of right of respondent environmental research center, inc. to respond filed.
2020-02-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 12, 2020)
2019-11-27
Application (19A605) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 9, 2019 to February 7, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.
2019-11-27
Application (19A605) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 7, 2020.
Attorneys
environmental research center, inc.
Jason Robert Flanders — Aqua Terra Aeris Law Group, Respondent
Hotze Health & Wellness Center International One, L.L.C.
Lawrence J. Joseph — Law Office of Lawrence J. Joseph, Petitioner