No. 18A1276

Karen Khan v. United States

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2019-06-06
Status: Presumed Complete
Type: A
Tags: circuit-split civil-rights equal-protection fifth-amendment money-mandating sovereign-immunity
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)

Federal Circuit's Application of the Plausibility Standard to Weigh Evidence Against Plaintiff Conflicts With This Court's Precedent In Twombly and Igbal As It Nullifies Procedural Due Process Under The Fifth Amendment To The U.S. Constitution;

U.S. Court of Federal Claims Has Concurrent Jurisdiction With A U.S. District Court Over a RICO Action Against the U.S. Pursuant To This

A Declaratory Judgment Is A Proper Vehicle For This Court To Uphold A Woman's Equality To A Male Man Under God's Word And The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments To The U.S. Constitution To Effectively Abolish The Class-Based Invidiously Discriminatory Animus Against Women Entrenched In America's Tribal Culture;

This Case Is A Proper Vehicle Through Which FBI Should Be Dismantled In View Of Its Unlawful Use Of Its Internal Policy COINTELPRO Against U.S. Citizens Especially Women Because FBI Employees Are By Law Public Servants And Not Public Rulers To Control And Oppress U.S. Citizens In Conflict With The. Fifth Amendment To The U.S. Constitution;

Is'This Case A Proper Vehicle For This Court To Permissibly Fashion A Remedy To Vindicate Federal Rights Under Fifth And Fourteenth Amendments To The U.S. Constitution When As In The Present Case There Is An Ongoing Violation Of Equal Protection Of The Laws;

Federal Circuit Committed An Egregious Error Because It Is In Defiance of All Relevant Statutory Provisions And Court Holdings On The Subject Of All Material Elements Required To Sustain Recovery Under Civil Rights And Civil RICO Statutes;

Is Civil Rights Statute 42 U.S.C. §1985 Read In Conjunction With 28 U.S.C. §1348 (a)(1) and (2) and 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(a), Money-Mandating Against the U.S. AND Money-Mandating U.S. Supreme Court Precedent In Monell v. Depariment of Social Services of City of New York;

This Case Is An Ideal Vehicle For This Court To Establish Solid Legal Foundations Under Amendment Fifth To The U.S. Constitution For Acceptable Surveillance Practices While Upholding Its Own Ruling In Ziglar That National-Security Concerns Must Not Become A Talisman A "Label" Used To "Cover A Multitude Of Sins" Especially When "Danger Of Abuse" Against Women Is Even More Heightened Given The Judiciary's Failure To Define "Security Interest" In Domestic Cases.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a civil rights statute that broadly defines 'person' to include government agencies creates a money-mandating cause of action that waives sovereign immunity for damages against the federal government

Docket Entries

2019-06-07
Application (18A1276) granted by The Chief Justice to file petition for a writ of certiorari in excess of word limits. The petition may not exceed 10,500 words.
2019-05-24
Application (18A1276) to file petition for a writ of certiorari in excess of word limits, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Karen Khan
Karen Khan — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent