No. 18-985
BMP Family Limited Partnership, et al. v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights due-process financial-records fourth-amendment internal-revenue-code katz-v-united-states neece-v-irs non-party-clients preemption privacy right-to-financial-privacy right-to-privacy standing summons-privacy tax-summons
Key Terms:
ERISA FourthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
ERISA FourthAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
The issue is whether the court below erroneously held that the issuance of summonses under 26 U.S.C. § 7609 preempts the privacy rights of non-party clients not under the purview of section 7609.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the issuance of summonses under 26 U.S.C. § 7609 preempts the privacy rights of non-party clients
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-01-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 28, 2019)
Attorneys
BMP Family Limited Partnership, et al.
Michael Robert Presley — Presley Law and Associates, P.A., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent